FAIL (the browser should render some flash content, not this).
Beaufort County passes smoking ban - New law to take effect Jan. 10
Changing Sunshine Law draws criticism
City council amends laws to allow liquor sales on Sundays
City council interviews law firms
Commission overhauls storm shutter rules - A new law would regulate the length of time Dania Beach residents and business owners can leave storm shutters up
Contact law for rental property owners faces possible changes
Judge rules against 2005 bankruptcy law - Restrictions on lawyers' advice, ads cited
Laws that govern giving - Changes affect charitable efforts for the holidays
Lawyers, cops find faults in abuse law
Legislators hear pleas for money, laws
Old building gets new life - Law firm Van Gilder and Trzynka has renovated it and moved in
Old West End war protest runs afoul of law - City says resident exceeds limit on yard signs
Purr and grrr over Tacoma pet laws
Panel opposes nepotism revision - Fayette law good, ethics group says
Sheriff, jail seek immigration law powers - Training, technology would aid detention and deportation
Smoking drifts back into area businesses - Owners complying with law say they are at a disadvantage
State law puts cart before the horse
Taft to consider red-light camera bill - New law would place restrictions on the traffic enforcement devices
Will lending law revision put brakes on debt-driven suicide

Judge rules against 2005 bankruptcy law - Restrictions on lawyers' advice, ads cited

A portion of the new U.S. bankruptcy law unfairly restricts attorneys and violates the First Amendment, a U.S. District Court judge in Minneapolis ruled this week.

Ruling in a lawsuit that challenges the bankruptcy law's provisions, Judge James Rosenbaum noted that part of the law "forbids truthful and possibly efficacious advice" from an attorney to a client. "If this is the government's view of legal ethics, it is a form of ethics unfamiliar to the Court."

Rosenbaum's ruling, unveiled on Thursday, denied a motion by the U.S. government to dismiss the case that was brought by bankruptcy attorneys and two anonymous plaintiffs. The attorneys are from Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, a Twin Cities bankruptcy firm well-known for its advertising.

In 2005, President Bush signed the bankruptcy law that makes it harder for debt-ridden Americans to get rid of their financial obligations.

"This law was drawn up by credit card companies," Robert Milavetz, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, said Friday. "Congressmen didn't carefully read this act" before making it law, he said.

Specifically, Rosenbaum's ruling addressed a provision in the 2005 law that says attorneys can't advise their clients to take on more debt as the clients consider filing for bankruptcy. The law also dictates what attorney advertisements must say, and Rosenbaum noted that such regulation is done at the state level. He said the provisions would be unconstitutional if applied to attorneys.

The next step in the case is now up to the U.S. Department of Justice. Officials with the department couldn't be reached for comment Friday.

"I think it will go up through the appeals process," said Larry Ponoroff, dean of the law school at Tulane University in New Orleans. In its broadest sense, he said, Rosenbaum's decision "reveals how internally inconsistent and frankly poorly drafted the 2005 act is."

For the moment, Ponoroff said, bankruptcy lawyers practicing in Minnesota could take comfort in the decision if they choose to pass such information on to their clients.